Bug #6140
closed
ngff_cardem: vid and pid example inconsistencies in manual
Added by mschramm 9 months ago.
Updated 9 months ago.
Description
In the ngff_cardem manual, there are some inconsistencies for pid:vid examples.
- section 5.1.2 : mentioned pin header's name is "X202" in versions above v1
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
a lot more issues corrected than just the vid:pid thing:
- unified all occurances of the ngff_cardem vid:pid
- unified all "note"-styled paragraphs
- all mentions of the serial debug connector now cover both X202 and X203
- added annotated image for pin assignment of X202
- "CE conforming" replaced by "CE compliant"
- more typos corr'd
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 06:31:13PM +0000, mschramm wrote:
- "CE conforming" replaced by "CE compliant"
it is called a "declaration of conformity" and not a "declaration of compliance"...
laforge wrote in #note-3:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 06:31:13PM +0000, mschramm wrote:
- "CE conforming" replaced by "CE compliant"
it is called a "declaration of conformity" and not a "declaration of compliance"...
Yes, but that conformity is already covered in the big "C". Translated from French, this would be "European Conformity conforming power supply" (in the manual's sentence in question). I don't really see how the present participle 'conforming' could fit here.
Also available in: Atom
PDF
