Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #6140

closed

ngff_cardem: vid and pid example inconsistencies in manual

Added by mschramm 9 months ago. Updated 9 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
-
Target version:
-
Start date:
08/23/2023
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Spec Reference:

Description

In the ngff_cardem manual, there are some inconsistencies for pid:vid examples.

Actions #1

Updated by mschramm 9 months ago

  • section 5.1.2 : mentioned pin header's name is "X202" in versions above v1
Actions #2

Updated by mschramm 9 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

a lot more issues corrected than just the vid:pid thing:

  • unified all occurances of the ngff_cardem vid:pid
  • unified all "note"-styled paragraphs
  • all mentions of the serial debug connector now cover both X202 and X203
  • added annotated image for pin assignment of X202
  • "CE conforming" replaced by "CE compliant"
  • more typos corr'd
Actions #3

Updated by laforge 9 months ago

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 06:31:13PM +0000, mschramm wrote:

  • "CE conforming" replaced by "CE compliant"

it is called a "declaration of conformity" and not a "declaration of compliance"...

Actions #4

Updated by mschramm 9 months ago

laforge wrote in #note-3:

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 06:31:13PM +0000, mschramm wrote:

  • "CE conforming" replaced by "CE compliant"

it is called a "declaration of conformity" and not a "declaration of compliance"...

Yes, but that conformity is already covered in the big "C". Translated from French, this would be "European Conformity conforming power supply" (in the manual's sentence in question). I don't really see how the present participle 'conforming' could fit here.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 48.8 MB)