Bug #1890
closed
Added by laforge over 7 years ago.
Updated over 7 years ago.
Description
OsmoDevCon was about the invitation-only developer part.
In order to avoid confusion about the public conference with its developer and user days and the invitation-only event, there should be a clear distinction also in naming. Let's try to clarify that soon.
Osmo{Dev,}Con ? (i.e. just drop the Dev part for the public event).
- Here the 'Dev' part would be 'Developers' rather than 'Development' (i.e. limited group)
- Answering a comment of the ML: The 'Com' part isn't really dropped, it's just played with a bit.
another point was that a binary named "osmocon" exists:
hwelte wrote:
Unfortunately OSmocomBB already has an 'osmocon' program
(the osmocom console program). Though the context should make it hard
to mix-up, the programmer in me likes to not overload the global
namespace ;)
I, personally, still tend towards OsmoCon as my favorite.
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Ok, then OsmoCon it is. We keep OsmoDevCon for the inivitation-only event.
| OsmoCon |
regular public technical conference with talks about usage/administration/installation and developer topics for cellular infrastructure projects |
| OsmoDevCon |
invitation-only event with discussion/hackathon/presentations on full scope of Osmocom projects |
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
Also available in: Atom
PDF
