Actions
Feature #4014
openAllow multiple [virtual] BTS instances on same [SDR] hardware that supports multiple TRX
Status:
New
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Target version:
-
Start date:
05/21/2019
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Spec Reference:
Description
14:02 < tnt> right ... osmo-trx doesn't support running two completely independent C0 over a single SDR.
14:02 < osmith> fixeria: nice!
14:03 <@LaF0rge> tnt: in theory it should be rather simple, and I would assume it's mostly a constraint
of osmo-bts-trx?
14:03 <@LaF0rge> tnt: I would assume osmo-trx doesn't care if you set multiple soft or hard transceivers
for a "CCCH+BCCH+..." combination
14:04 <@LaF0rge> might actually be worth a feature request ticket
14:04 <@LaF0rge> oh actually, wait, osmo-bts-trx *should* be able to do it. That was what the
phy_link/phy_instance abstraction was introduced years ago. Not specifically for the
-trx backend, but in general to have that flexibility....
14:05 <@LaF0rge> ... but it was meant for having multiple phy links + instances aggregated into a single
BTS with many TRX. Here we'd want to use it the other way around. Interesting idea, if
only I had time :)
No data to display
Actions
