Actions
Bug #5467
closedrepo-install-test fails for osmo-msc, MGW: Address already in use
Start date:
02/25/2022
Due date:
% Done:
100%
Spec Reference:
Description
Feb 25 10:45:21 57c7d4458dc5 osmo-msc[16190]: <0024> mgcp_client.c:792 MGW(mgw) MGCP client: using endpoint domain '@mgw' Feb 25 10:45:21 57c7d4458dc5 osmo-msc[16190]: <0014> socket.c:419 unable to bind socket: (null):2728: Address already in use Feb 25 10:45:21 57c7d4458dc5 osmo-msc[16190]: <0014> socket.c:431 no suitable local addr found for: (null):2728 Feb 25 10:45:21 57c7d4458dc5 osmo-msc[16190]: <0024> mgcp_client.c:912 MGW(mgw) Failed to initialize socket (any):2728 -> (null):2427 for MGW: Address already in use Feb 25 10:45:21 57c7d4458dc5 osmo-msc[16190]: MGCPGW connect failed Feb 25 10:45:21 57c7d4458dc5 systemd[1]: osmo-msc.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=7/NOTRUNNING Feb 25 10:45:21 57c7d4458dc5 systemd[1]: osmo-msc.service: Unit entered failed state. Feb 25 10:45:21 57c7d4458dc5 systemd[1]: osmo-msc.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
This job starts all systemd services of Osmocom programs with default configurations, and checks whether they start up.
I guess the failure relates to osmo-hnbgw now also using the mgcp client, and both using the default address.
dexter: could you change the address in the default config of osmo-hnbgw?
Updated by dexter about 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
I have looked at the default configs for osmo-bsc and osmo-msc. They both use the same ip, but different ports. We should use a different port with the osmo-hnbgw default config.
Here is a patch: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/27331
Updated by dexter about 2 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- % Done changed from 50 to 100
We have optimized the default config so that the ports won't collide anymore, so we can resolve this ticket now.
Actions