Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #1853

closed

validate dynamic TCH/PDCH support in osmo-bts-trx

Added by laforge over 7 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
osmo-bts-trx
Target version:
Start date:
11/18/2016
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Spec Reference:

Description

dynamic PDCH/TCH support has been tested and validated with other BTS models, but not ever tested or validated with osmo-bts-trx so far.


Checklist

  • validate TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH
  • validate TCH/F_PDCH

Related issues

Related to OsmoBTS - Feature #1648: Verify Multi-TRX support for osmo-bts-trxClosedmsuraev03/11/2016

Actions
Related to OsmoBSC - Bug #3099: dynamic timeslots not tested by BSC_Tests.ttcnResolvedlaforge03/22/2018

Actions
Related to OsmoBTS - Bug #3131: dynamic timeslots not tested by BTS_Tests.ttcnResolvedlaforge04/04/2018

Actions
Related to OsmoBTS - Bug #3493: osmo-bts-trx gprs Attach fails when using TCH/F_PDCHResolvedneels08/21/2018

Actions
Blocked by OsmoBTS - Bug #1865: TCH/F_PDCH is not working as TCH/F channel for CS voice call in USRP B210 board ( osmo-trx)Rejectedmrinal12/02/2016

Actions
Blocked by OsmoMSC - Feature #1778: avoid mismatching TCH/F vs TCH/H pchan typesResolvedneels07/21/2016

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by laforge about 7 years ago

  • Assignee set to msuraev

Is this statement actually still true? If we did already verify this, feel free to close without re-testing. It should (have been?) part of the tests wireless' was doing?

Actions #2

Updated by msuraev about 7 years ago

  • Related to Bug #1865: TCH/F_PDCH is not working as TCH/F channel for CS voice call in USRP B210 board ( osmo-trx) added
Actions #3

Updated by msuraev almost 7 years ago

  • Checklist item validate TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH added
  • Checklist item validate TCH/F_PDCH added

According to NITB user manual osmo-bts-trx should support both types of dynamic timeslots, although support is limited ATM due to linked bugs.

Actions #4

Updated by msuraev almost 7 years ago

  • Related to Feature #1778: avoid mismatching TCH/F vs TCH/H pchan types added
Actions #5

Updated by msuraev almost 7 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Stalled
  • % Done changed from 0 to 10

TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH is working (as TCH/H and PDCH but not TCH/F) - see linked bugs.

Actions #6

Updated by msuraev almost 7 years ago

  • Related to deleted (Bug #1865: TCH/F_PDCH is not working as TCH/F channel for CS voice call in USRP B210 board ( osmo-trx))
Actions #7

Updated by msuraev almost 7 years ago

  • Blocked by Bug #1865: TCH/F_PDCH is not working as TCH/F channel for CS voice call in USRP B210 board ( osmo-trx) added
Actions #8

Updated by msuraev almost 7 years ago

  • Related to deleted (Feature #1778: avoid mismatching TCH/F vs TCH/H pchan types)
Actions #9

Updated by msuraev almost 7 years ago

  • Blocked by Feature #1778: avoid mismatching TCH/F vs TCH/H pchan types added
Actions #10

Updated by msuraev almost 7 years ago

  • Related to Feature #1648: Verify Multi-TRX support for osmo-bts-trx added
Actions #11

Updated by laforge about 6 years ago

  • Assignee changed from msuraev to 4368
Actions #12

Updated by laforge almost 6 years ago

  • Related to Bug #3099: dynamic timeslots not tested by BSC_Tests.ttcn added
Actions #13

Updated by laforge almost 6 years ago

I think this should wait until #3099 (TTCN-3 tests for dynamic PDCH) exist, after which it will come more or less for free.

Actions #14

Updated by laforge almost 6 years ago

  • Related to Bug #3131: dynamic timeslots not tested by BTS_Tests.ttcn added
Actions #15

Updated by laforge almost 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Stalled to In Progress
  • % Done changed from 10 to 80

with the new dynamic PDCH tests BTS_Tests.ttcn we can verify dynamic PDCH operation.

Actions #16

Updated by laforge almost 6 years ago

  • Checklist item validate TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH set to Done
  • Checklist item validate TCH/F_PDCH set to Done
  • % Done changed from 80 to 100

validated in osmo-bts-trx + fake_trx + trxcon environment.

Actions #17

Updated by pespin over 5 years ago

  • Related to Bug #3493: osmo-bts-trx gprs Attach fails when using TCH/F_PDCH added
Actions #18

Updated by neels over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
  • Assignee changed from 4368 to pespin

pespin, can you make sense of this status? All checklist items checked, 100% but still in progress? This can be resolved, right?

Actions #19

Updated by pespin over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

Yes, resloving

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 48.8 MB)