https://projects.osmocom.org/https://projects.osmocom.org/favicon.ico?16647414092016-11-09T10:07:19ZOpen Source Mobile CommunicationsOsmoBSC - Bug #1610: RF channel release skipping T3109https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1610?journal_id=23972016-11-09T10:07:19Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Related to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-2 priority-default closed" href="/issues/49">Bug #49</a>: T3109 not implemented</i> added</li></ul> OsmoBSC - Bug #1610: RF channel release skipping T3109https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1610?journal_id=31682017-02-28T16:37:33Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>dexter</i></li><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Normal</i> to <i>Low</i></li></ul> OsmoBSC - Bug #1610: RF channel release skipping T3109https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1610?journal_id=46202017-07-19T14:21:26Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Related to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-2 priority-default closed" href="/issues/50">Bug #50</a>: Abnormal channel release handling is wrong</i> added</li></ul> OsmoBSC - Bug #1610: RF channel release skipping T3109https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1610?journal_id=46272017-07-19T14:33:36Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Related to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-3 priority-high3 closed" href="/issues/2380">Bug #2380</a>: logical channels can get stuck if BTS sends no RELEASE INDICATION for SACCH / T3109 can be disabled</i> added</li></ul> OsmoBSC - Bug #1610: RF channel release skipping T3109https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1610?journal_id=66362017-12-10T18:59:06Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Related to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-2 priority-default closed child" href="/issues/2734">Bug #2734</a>: RF channel teradown timers (T3109) way too large</i> added</li></ul> OsmoBSC - Bug #1610: RF channel release skipping T3109https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1610?journal_id=66882017-12-10T20:05:31Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Project</strong> changed from <i>OpenBSC</i> to <i>OsmoBSC</i></li><li><strong>Category</strong> deleted (<del><i>libbsc</i></del>)</li></ul> OsmoBSC - Bug #1610: RF channel release skipping T3109https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1610?journal_id=67022017-12-10T20:15:07Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Category</strong> set to <i>A-bis RSL</i></li></ul> OsmoBSC - Bug #1610: RF channel release skipping T3109https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1610?journal_id=100852018-06-26T08:51:28Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> changed from <i>dexter</i> to <i>neels</i></li><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Low</i> to <i>Normal</i></li></ul><p>I would suspect this is resolved with the lchan fsm?</p> OsmoBSC - Bug #1610: RF channel release skipping T3109https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1610?journal_id=101692018-07-02T11:58:39Zneelsnhofmeyr@sysmocom.de
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>90</i></li></ul><p>the lchan_fsm.c I have T3109 and T3111 in</p>
<pre>
[LCHAN_ST_WAIT_SAPIS_RELEASED] = { .T=3109 },
[LCHAN_ST_WAIT_BEFORE_RF_RELEASE] = { .T=3111 },
[LCHAN_ST_WAIT_RF_RELEASE_ACK] = { .T=3111 },
[LCHAN_ST_WAIT_AFTER_ERROR] = { .T=993111 },
</pre>
<p>with</p>
<pre>
{ .T=3109, .default_val=5, .desc="RSL SACCH deactivation" },
{ .T=3111, .default_val=2, .desc="Wait time before RSL RF Channel Release" },
{ .T=993111, .default_val=4, .desc="Wait time after lchan was released in error"
"(should be T3111 + 2s)" },
</pre>
<p>Actually I also use T3109 during normal channel release, when we sent RSL Release for the SAPIs to wait for the RLL Release CNF messages.</p>
<p>So, yes, T3109 is definitely implemented and there is no way around it with the lchan_fsm.c.</p> OsmoBSC - Bug #1610: RF channel release skipping T3109https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1610?journal_id=108602018-08-20T15:36:06Zneelsnhofmeyr@sysmocom.de
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>90</i> to <i>100</i></li></ul><p>merged.</p>